Quotes, transcripts and more.
I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact.
I went to Russia three times to negotiate purchasing an ICBM.
Twenty launches a year, is not a crazy number at all. We expect that to occur without any miracles.
Technically, if somebody were to stow aboard the cargo version of Dragon, they'd actually be fine. I mean, hopefully.
The climate debate is an interesting one. If you ask any scientist, are you sure that human activity is causing global warming, any scientist should say no. Because you can not be sure. On the other hand, if you said, do you think we should put an arbitrary number of trillions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere and just keep doing it until something bad happens, they'll probably say no too.
the idea of lying on a beach as my main thing, just sounds like the worst - it sounds horrible to me. I would go bonkers. I would have to be on serious drugs.
They can come back if they like, if they don't like it, of course. You get a free return ticket. There's sometimes a debate about going to Mars one-way and whether that makes things easier, and I think for the initial flights perhaps, but long term, to get the cost down, you need the spacecraft back. Whether the people come back is irrelevant, but you must have the ship back because those things are expensive. So anyone who wants to return can just jump on.
I really want SpaceX to help make life multi-planetary. I'd like to see a self-sustaining base on Mars.
if you can show people that there is a way, then there is plenty of will.
Feel free to leave if I'm getting boring.
I wish I could just stab that bloody thing through the heart.
I thought it was quite sad that the Apollo program represented the high water mark of space exploration. It was not something I was able to witness in real time, because I was -2 when they landed.
Well, the United States is the least bad at encouraging innovation.
the Falcon 9/Dragon system that we're launching today, what can it do? If the degree of safety required was equivalent to that of the shuttle, we could actually launch astronauts on the next flight.
So, unless you're a mushroom, you're out of luck.
Solar City is doing super well. They're growing at 50% to 100% a year with positive cash flow, which is pretty incredible. I just show up at the board meetings to hear the good news. It's really great.
You know, we have 1% of the lobbying power of Boeing and Lockheed. If this decision is made as a function of lobbying power, we are screwed.
we'll have a production rate of about 400 booster engines per year. Which, I think, would be more engines than the rest of the world production combined. As it is, we're already more than the rest of US production combined. Although that's not saying much. Unfortunately.
Ya know, Wikipedia's actually pretty damn good. It's like 90% accurate. It's just not clear what 90%.
If one set a standard that you couldn't have loss of life, then there would be no transport. You wouldn't even be allowed to walk.
Making standard efficiency solar panels is about as hard as making dry wall. It's really easy. In fact, I'd say dry wall's probably harder.
I always kind of think of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory when someone mentions the space elevator.
We're happy to take people the Moon. If somebody wants to go to the Moon, we can definitely do it.
New technology and innovation can have a downside and one of the downsides is people are able to extract far more hydrocarbons than we thought were possible.
I think that we're unique in the launch business of publishing our prices on our website. Whereas other launch providers sort of treat it like a rug bazaar - they'll charge you what they think you can afford. We believe in every day low prices, you know, and we've stuck to our guns on that.
It's one hell of a golf cart. You go on the golf course with this puppy, you're really going to have a good time between the holes.
I like lipstick, it's not like I've got anything against it. Can't wait for that comment to go out there.
You've gotta.. you show a little leg, but not all of it.
Let's say you made pencils, well, about 40% of your business would be with the government. That's not an unreasonable number.
It looks like a real alien spaceship
Falcon Heavy costs about a third as much per flight as Delta IV Heavy, but carries twice as much payload to orbit, so it's effectively a six-fold improvement in the cost per pound to orbit.
I wanted to have something that is really profoundly better than a gasoline car for driving long distance.
With respect to air breathing hybrid stages, I have not seen how the physics of that makes sense. There may be some assumptions that I have that are incorrect, but really, for an orbital rocket, you're trying to get out of the atmosphere as soon as possible because the atmosphere is just as thick as soup when you're trying to go fast, and it's not helped by the fact that the atmosphere is mostly not oxygen.
I don't think the government intends to stand in the way of innovation but sometimes it can over-regulate industries to the point where innovation becomes very difficult.
it's as though things automatically improve. They do not automatically improve!
At the beginning of starting SpaceX I thought that the most likely outcome was failure.
how much money do you think the Chinese government has put into solar? Estimates are about $40 billion. Okay? So, we've got our team operating on a pittance, and we've got China operating on $40 billion, and our team lost. That should be no surprise.
I love being a political football.
I think we've been very solid in keeping our prices steady and we do not expect to make price increases in the future except for inflation related adjustments.
Tesla, in the second half of this year, will produce more electric cars than it has produced in its entire lifetime to date. I feel very confident predicting that, within 20 years, the majority of new cars produced will be fully electric, and it may be closer to 10 years than 20.
If all we do is be yet another satellite launcher or something like that or ultimately only as good as Soyuz in cost per person to orbit, that would be okay, but really not a success in my book.
I think we had a critical mass of technical talent and just enough money and a design that was sensible and those were probably the three ingredients that resulted in success eventually.
So if someone had asked me, do you think Solyndra is a good investment, I would have said no, you're going to get your ass kicked.
Dragon is capable of reentering from even Mars velocities including lunar velocities, etc. It's a very capable vehicle and is not limited to simply low Earth orbit operations.
I think NASA is actually doing a pretty good job overall.
If you look at Russian rocketry, since the fall of the Soviet Union, there's really been no significant developments. The technology has barely progressed.
a lot of the major newspapers seem to be trying to answer the question: what is the worst thing that happened on Earth today?
It seems logical that you should tax things that are most likely to be bad rather than - like, that's why we tax cigarettes and alcohol, because those are probably bad for you.
It's important to bear in mind that we'd love to hire a lot more people than we currently hire but we also can't run out of money and die.
if humanity had taken an extra 10% longer to get here, it wouldn't have gotten here at all.
the Atlas V cannot possibly be described as providing assured access to space for our nation when supply of its main engine depends on President Putin's permission.
Sometimes people are under the impression that NASA is the vast majority of our business, but actually they're the biggest single customer but they're only about a quarter of our orders.
I'm trying to get back to my home planet, ya know.
we try not to tell anyone outside the space business that it's for a rocket, because they assume rockets are made of magic.
And frankly, if our rockets are good enough for NASA, why are they not good enough for the Air Force? It doesn't make sense.
That is how a 21-st century spaceship should land.
SpaceX has a very long term mission. We want to just keep improving our technology until there's a city on Mars. Well, that could take a long time.
there's no stone that hasn't been overturned, at least twice, to maximize the probability of success.
Although, it'd be nice to go inside.. but for that, we will need a comically fast set of stairs.
No, we're not replacing NASA. NASA is our most important customer.
I think America is probably the only place where this would be possible, for a private company to get this far.
I mean, the market is like a manic depressive.
I think we've got a decent chance of bringing a stage back this year, which would be wonderful.
really critical to the development of the SuperDraco engine was the ability to do 3d metal printing
You know, couldn't really send people.. if they were alive.
Governments around the world certainly make a lot of noise about caring about the environment but the results are not very good.
We're probably going to have to iterate our way there I think.
Lockheed and Boeing are used to stomping on new companies, and they've certainly tried to stomp on us.
Will space travel be as ubiquitous as air travel? I don't think it will be as ubiquitous - I would love to say it is - but I don't believe the costs will ever get quite as affordable as air travel and hopefully I'm not gonna get fired by Elon for saying this. - Gwynne Shotwell
I really look forward to the day when every car on the road is electric. That's the goal, we want to make that happen.
I actually tweeted out a link to the latest thing. Mostly the people on the NASA Spaceflight forum were able to fix the video.
If somebody can think of something better to do, I'd love to hear it.
I mean, space is a dangerous thing.
We do hire some MBAs but it's usually in spite of the MBA, not because of it.
We want to open up space for humanity, and in order to do that, space must be affordable.
if you can get a group of really talented people together and unite them around a challenge and have them work together to the best of their abilities then a company will achieve great things.
Most important of all is we did a good job for NASA. I always think, did we do a good job for our customer? Everything else is secondary to that.
we're looking at launches to be in the five to seven million dollar range - Gwynne Shotwell
if you can make the product good enough that it so far exceeds people's expectations that it just makes them happy, I think that's amazing.
Ya know, there's a lot of people who think that human spaceflight should not be allowed in the commercial sector. It's sort of an odd position I think, but there's still a lot of people who feel that way.
With each successive launch - we have several more launches this year - we expect to get more and more precise with the landing and, if all goes well, I am optimistic that we'll be able to land the stage back at Cape Canaveral by the end of the year.
The national security launches should be put up for competition. They should not be awarded on a sole-source uncompeted basis.
As long as we continue to throw away rockets and spacecraft, we will never have true access to space.
We also need to make sure we don't create SkyNet.
No, if they've been punching us in the face, they shouldn't expect we're going to be their friend.
That's why I've committed to fund $10 million worth of AI safety research, and I'll probably do more.
In fact, certainly you can construct scenarios where recovery of human civilization does not occur.
We're going to try to do for satellites what we've done for rockets.
In fact, at one point the judge actually had to remind the justice department lawyer that he works for the American people, not Boeing and Lockheed.
No, we wouldn't have come because it would have been quite rude to not have offered incentives.
I can whistle Pachelbel's Canon, which is a tricky one, but I'm not going to whistle for you now because that'd be too embarrassing.
I would never leave Tesla ever, but I may not be CEO forever. No-one should be CEO forever.
Looking in the long term, and saying what's needed to create a city on Mars? Well, one thing's for sure: a lot of money.
With artificial intelligence we are summoning the demon.
Basically, people need a compelling and affordable electric vehicle. That is the holy grail, and we're trying to get there as fast as we can.
Star Wars was the first movie I ever saw, so it was going to be fairly influential.
So, it's not paranoia or made up, people did time in the big house. You can pretty much bet that's the tip of the iceberg.
They don't want a fair competition. They don't even want an unfair competition. They want no competition at all.
Ya know, John McCain spent a lot of time in a prisoner of war camp - one would think he's not easily intimidated.
This is intended to be a significant amount of revenue and help fund a city on Mars.